chronovore: (mouthy)
chronovore ([personal profile] chronovore) wrote2007-11-16 08:05 pm

sharing is not a crime

This has got to be one of the most bullshit pieces of fearmongering, wrong-headed tripe I have read outside of a Bush presidency State of the Union transcription:
Wi-Fi piggybacking widespread: Sophos has revealed new research into the use of other people's Wi-Fi networks to piggyback onto the internet without payment. The research shows that 54 percent of computer users have admitted breaking the law, by using someone else's wireless internet access without permission.

According to Sophos, many internet-enabled homes fail to properly secure their wireless connection properly with passwords and encryption, allowing freeloading passers-by and neighbours to steal internet access rather than paying an internet service provider (ISP) for their own. In addition, while businesses often have security measures in place to protect the Wi-Fi networks within their offices from attack, Sophos experts note that remote users working from home could prove to be a weak link in corporate defences.

Stealing Wi-Fi internet access may feel like a victimless crime, but it deprives ISPs of revenue. Furthermore, if you've hopped onto your next door neighbours' wireless broadband connection to illegally download movies and music from the net, chances are that you are also slowing down their internet access and impacting on their download limit. For this reason, most ISPs put a clause in their contracts ordering users not to share access with neighbours - but it's very hard for them to enforce this.
Survey results
Have you ever used someone else's Wi-Fi connection without their permission?
Yes 54%
No 46%
Sophos online survey, 560 respondents, 31 October - 6 November 2007.
Sophos recommends that home owners and businesses alike set up their networks with security in mind, ensuring that strong encryption is in place to prevent hackers from eavesdropping on communications and potentially stealing usernames, passwords and other confidential information.
Sharing is not a crime; if I have a phone and am entitled to limitless free local calls, and if I choose to let my neighbor come over and make free local calls whenever they want, or even give them a satellite phone so they can use it without bothering me, that's not a crime. As for the EULA, I'd be hard pressed to believe it would hold up in a court.

I lock up my computers, but not my WLAN. I'm willing to let people use my WLAN as long as no-one goes crazy-abusive on it.

Edit: Apparently this is an IT security blog in the UK, where accessing a wifi network without permission is illegal. This is not /generally/ illegal in the USA, though there have been exceptions (see commments).

[identity profile] indrigirl.livejournal.com 2007-11-16 11:48 am (UTC)(link)
Our neighbor's wi-fi is the only thing that keeps us going when our Earthlink connection goes bad, which is like... all the time. So even though they've got it configured so we can't go to YouTube or play Sudoku or anything remotely fun, still, they're saving our ass when the ISP we're paying can't get it together.

[identity profile] chronovore.livejournal.com 2007-11-16 03:41 pm (UTC)(link)
It turns out this piece was posted from a UK perspective, where this behavior is illegal, idiotically.

In a rare fit of common sense, the US courts have so far found that using an unsecured WLAN is acceptable. This doesn't jibe with the guy who was arrested (http://www.thewirelessreport.com/2006/06/22/be-careful-about-web-surfing-in-coffee-shops-without-buying-anyt/) for "illegally accessing a network" by sitting outside a coffeeshop and accessing their wi-fi without buying anything.

Just to be clear, I looked all over the page for a link saying, "We're a republican-funded thinktank," or "we are an independently funded security consultancy in Sao Paolo, Brazil," as some form of explanation before posting this, but the site doesn't have a handy "About..." link anywhere on it.

Yeah, basically, you're safe from prosecution; you may even be able to charge your neighbor rent for the wifi's signal tresspass onto your apartment. (I keeeed, I keeeed.)

[identity profile] chronovore.livejournal.com 2007-11-16 04:17 pm (UTC)(link)
Here, too:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,276720,00.html

[identity profile] benchilada.livejournal.com 2007-11-16 02:23 pm (UTC)(link)
Same here.

It's sad, though, because somebody's been overdoing it lately, which means I'm gonna have to lock it down for a while. I *WANT* to share it, and I have for about 3 years now, but if somebody's gonna be downloading torrents or whatever the hell this person is doing, then everybody's gotta get offa my dime.

*sigh*

[identity profile] chronovore.livejournal.com 2007-11-16 03:45 pm (UTC)(link)
I hear you. If I noticed someone had tried to overstay their welcome, I'd be sad, shut down the freebie access for a season, then probably restart it. Unwelcome guests must be dealt with, if they interfere with your life. Happily fiber-optic-to-the-home is freaking cheap in Japan, and I've not been able to discern any hits on my speed at any time.

[identity profile] mckenzee.livejournal.com 2007-11-16 10:05 pm (UTC)(link)
I wish someone would claim "unlimited=infinite" and sue the ISP for not giving every customer ALL the bandwidth.