Media: To Kill A (Possible) Predator?:
On a fall day in 2006, a small-town Texas county prosecutor named Bill Conradt raised a loaded Browning .380 handgun to his temple, pulled the trigger, and ended his life at 56 years. Before him stood a SWAT team from a local police department that had just barged into his home after he did not answer several knocks at his door. Outside the home, film crews from NBC Dateline's controversial To Catch A Predator program were waiting, hoping to get the arrest on tape and allow host Chris Hansen the chance to grill Conradt about explicit online chats he is said to have had with a decoy posing as a teenage boy. Instead they soon found out that Conradt had taken his own life. There would be no chance to grill him. [full article]
Was this big news in the USA? I'd not heard about it until this Fast Company blog entry. It sounds like incredibly irresponsible journalism, as well as bringing vigilantism and "news creation" to a horrifying new level. A new low level, as it were.
As a father, child pornographers and pedophiles occupy a special, frightening hell in a dark corner of my heart. As mentioned in the article, maybe this guy was guilty, maybe he wasn't - he'll never have a chance to recover, and I'm not particularly
interested in helping pedophiles "get better." I want them off the streets. However this guy didn't even show up for the entrapment/sting meeting, but they still went after him. Maybe he decided it wasn't a good idea, or maybe he sensed a trap. Then he looked out his window and saw that he was about to face a violent takedown by law enforcement on national TV. How does ANYBODY face that kind of scenario? I think it'd be easy to make very bad decisions then.
And whatever happened to "innocent until proven guilty"?